For public contracting authorities
A second opinion before your tender is published
You have prepared your agency tender yourself. Before it goes out, we review the documents from two angles: Does the procedure work professionally? And does it hold up legally?
What we review
- Tender documents: Is the subject of the contract clear? Are minimum requirements, award criteria and later contractual services clearly separated?
- Briefing: Do the agencies have all the information they need for a sensible solution? Are binding requirements and open questions clearly distinguished?
- Award criteria: Are they specific, related to the contract and provided with evaluation anchors? Do the weighting and the subject of the contract match?
- Decision matrix: Is the calculation method correct? How do quality and price points relate to each other?
- Price sheet: Will the offers really be comparable in the end?
- Pitch fee and deadlines: Do effort, time and remuneration match?
What you receive
You receive an annotated set of your documents with specific wording suggestions. In addition, a catalogue of permissible award criteria and, if necessary, a revised decision matrix. In a joint meeting, we go through the most important points.
On request, we also support you in selecting agencies for the longlist and shortlist.
Who this is for
For procurement offices and communication departments that generally run procedures themselves and want certainty at critical points. Many problems that later become visible in the evaluation or in a review procedure already arise in the documents.